Are modifications of normal debate proposed by the motion to Limit or Extend Limits of Debate true?

The statement that modifications of normal debate proposed by the motion to Limit or Extend Limits of Debate are true is correct because this motion specifically alters how debates are conducted within a meeting or assembly.

When a member proposes to Limit or Extend Limits of Debate, they are essentially suggesting changes to the standard rules governing the discussion time and procedures. This could mean setting a time limit on how long members can speak on a motion or extending the allowable time for discussion if it seems insufficient for the topic at hand. Such adjustments can greatly influence the flow of debate, allowing for more focused discussions or ensuring that all viewpoints are thoroughly explored.

The ability to modify debate rules is important in maintaining order and ensuring that discussions are productive and fair. This flexibility allows assemblies to adapt their procedural rules to better fit the context of their discussions, thereby enhancing the decision-making process.