Can a main motion conflict with a previously adopted motion if it is not a motion to Rescind or Amend?

A main motion can indeed conflict with a previously adopted motion even if it is not specifically a motion to Rescind or Amend. In parliamentary procedure, when a main motion is introduced, it can propose a new action or policy that directly contradicts the outcomes of an earlier motion. The key aspect is that while motions can often cover similar topics or areas of discussion, how they align with previously adopted actions determines whether they can stand concurrently.

This principle maintains a coherent procedural order. For instance, if an assembly had previously adopted a motion to hold an event on a certain date, a new motion suggesting the same event on that same date would conflict with the earlier decision. Although the assembly might allow for varied discussions and motions, the potential for conflicting actions remains unless specifically resolved through a motion to Rescind or Amend.

Thus, the assertion that a main motion can conflict with an adopted motion, even without being classified as a motion to Rescind or Amend, is accurate.