If a rising vote remains inconclusive, can the chair or the assembly order the vote to be counted? True or False?

In parliamentary procedure, if a rising vote is considered inconclusive—meaning that the chair is unable to determine which side has more support due to the ambiguity of the results—the chair does have the authority to order the vote to be counted. This counting of votes can provide a clear outcome and uphold democratic principles by ensuring that every voice is accounted for accurately, especially in close or contentious decisions.

This process is integral in assemblies where making informed and transparent decisions is critical, fostering confidence in the decision-making process. If the initial method of voting lacks clarity, transitioning to a counted vote safeguards fairness and accuracy.

The other options suggest conditions or limitations that do not accurately reflect the procedures of parliamentary voting. Thus, stating that the chair or assembly can order a count when a vote appears inconclusive aligns with standard parliamentary practices.