If the adopted program is not being followed, can a single member require that such a schedule be enforced?

The notion that a single member can require the enforcement of an adopted program embodies the principle that individual members hold certain rights within an organization or governing body. When an adopted program or schedule exists, it is reflective of collective decisions made during meetings or through consensus among the members. This means that the intent of the members should be upheld, and if one member observes that the agreed-upon rules or programs are not being adhered to, they have the authority to insist on compliance.

This requirement for adherence to the adopted program emphasizes the importance of accountability within the group, affirming that individual members play a critical role in maintaining the integrity of agreed-upon standards and practices. Thus, even if it appears that members are not following through on commitments, an individual has the empowerment to call for accountability regarding those commitments, reinforcing the collaborative nature of the organization.

The context here suggests that while group dynamics often dictate the need for teamwork and consensus, the ability of a single member to act is an essential safeguard for the efficacy of the adopted rules.