Is any main motion that conflicts with the bylaws in order?

In parliamentary procedure, a main motion that conflicts with the bylaws is not considered in order. Bylaws are foundational rules established by an organization, detailing its structure and governing procedures. They serve as a legal framework for the organization’s operations. Any main motion that is in conflict with these established rules cannot be entertained because it undermines the authority and stability that the bylaws are intended to provide.

If a motion were allowed to contradict the bylaws, it would create confusion and inconsistency in the organization’s governance. Thus, adherence to the bylaws is paramount to ensure that all decisions and actions taken are legitimate and within the agreed-upon rules of the organization. The integrity of procedural rules is essential for maintaining order and fairness during meetings, and thus any main motion that conflicts with the bylaws is inherently out of order.