Is it true or false that the lack of a second becomes immaterial once debate has commenced?

The statement is true because once debate on a motion has begun, the procedural requirement for a second becomes irrelevant. This is based on the understanding that the initial second serves to show that at least one other member supports the discussion of a motion; however, once debate is underway, the collective engagement of members in that discussion signifies the motion is of interest to the assembly. Therefore, although a second is needed for a motion to be formally introduced, any concerns regarding the lack of a second are addressed once members start debating the issue at hand. This reflects the core functions of parliamentary procedure—ensuring orderly discussion while allowing for participation and engagement from all members.