Is the statement "A motion is a formal proposal by a member for action" true or false?

The statement "A motion is a formal proposal by a member for action" is indeed true because it captures the essence of what a motion is in the context of parliamentary procedure. A motion serves as a structured way for members of a group or assembly to propose actions or decisions. It is typically presented verbally or in writing and must go through a defined process of discussion, debate, and voting before it can be accepted or rejected.

In meetings that follow parliamentary rules, motions play a critical role in ensuring that members can formally express their support or opposition to various actions, facilitating organized and democratic decision-making. The formal aspect of a motion is vital as it allows members to have clarity and understanding about the action being proposed, ensuring all members are on the same page regarding what is being discussed.

The other choices do not accurately reflect the nature of a motion. The idea of a motion being false or conditionally true undermines the definitive role it plays in formal settings, where clarity and structure are paramount for effective governance and decision-making. In this context, the statement stands as a simple yet accurate reflection of the procedural norms that guide formal gatherings and decision-making bodies.