What do incidental main motions and original main motions primarily differ in?

The key difference between incidental main motions and original main motions lies in their sources of introduction. Original main motions are initiated by a member who is proposing a new idea or action for consideration by the assembly, representing a primary purpose of discussion or decision-making. In contrast, incidental main motions arise from the context of a main motion already on the floor and are intended to address specific procedural issues or clarify the main motion being discussed.

While both types of motions may require a vote and contribute to the assembly's discussion, their sources of introduction delineate their primary functions in the parliamentary procedure. Original main motions are independent and introduce new business, whereas incidental main motions are contingent upon existing business and serve to facilitate the discussion of that business.

Acknowledging this distinction is crucial for understanding the rules governing parliamentary procedure and effectively contributing to organizational meetings.