When is the motion to postpone considered out of order?

The motion to postpone is considered out of order when it is postponed beyond the current session for organizations that meet less than quarterly. This is because the purpose of the motion to postpone is to delay discussion on a particular issue to a later time that is convenient and appropriate for the attendees. If an organization meets infrequently, postponing an issue beyond the current meeting can effectively prevent it from being addressed in a timely manner. Therefore, in such contexts, a postponement that extends beyond the current meeting would hinder the group’s ability to move forward with its agenda and is thus ruled out of order.

Contextually, the other options do not align with the procedural rules surrounding the motion to postpone. Disagreement from other members does not inherently affect the validity of the motion itself. Additionally, raising the motion during an executive session does not make it out of order merely based on the session type—what matters is the timing and context of the postponement. Finally, the fact that a member has not yet spoken on the topic does not disqualify the motion; individuals who haven’t contributed can still participate in motions regarding the agenda.