Who is required to read a written motion delivered to the chair?

The correct choice emphasizes the responsibility of the author of the motion to present their proposal clearly to the assembly. When a written motion is delivered to the chair, it is customary for the author to read it to ensure that the motion is accurately represented in its original intent and wording. This practice allows for clarity and understanding among all members present, as they hear the motion directly from its creator.

The author’s reading also provides an opportunity for any immediate questions or clarifications regarding the motion, contributing to a more transparent discussion and decision-making process. This procedure is fundamental in meeting protocols to ensure that all members are on the same page and fully understand the context and content of the motion before deliberation occurs.

In contrast, other options do not align with the established practices related to motions in typical parliamentary procedures. While the chair may facilitate the process and summarize the motion, it is not their role to read the motion unless specifically required. Allowing any member to read it would lead to inconsistencies and potential misinterpretations. Lastly, stating that there is no requirement for reading undermines the need for clarity and accuracy in formal proceedings where motions play a critical role.